Carlo Ancelotti confirms James Rodriguez will miss the Southampton game

0
61

Everton manager Carlo Ancelotti has validated that James Rodriguez and Seamus Coleman will miss the game against Southampton this weekend.

James Rodriguez got an injury early on in the Merseyside Derby after a take on from Virgil van Dijk and Seamus Coleman will be out for 2 or 3 weeks.

“Unfortunately, James had a problem during the game [against Liverpool],” Ancelotti stated to Sky Sports.

“He had a mistimed tackle with Virgil van Dijk at the beginning of the game and I think he will not be available for the game against Southampton.”

The Toffees are already without Richarlison who was dispatched for a negligent deal with on Thiago Alcantara and it will be intriguing to see how the Everton attack manages the lack of these players.

Rodriguez has remained in marvelous form since his move to Goodison Park and he will definitely be missed out onagainst Southampton He has been the team’s main developer up until now this season and the likes of Iwobi, Sigurdsson and Gomes will need to step up in his lack.

The Colombian has 3 goals and 3 assists in his 5 Premier League appearances up until now.

Richarlison will be abig miss as well The Brazilian is outstanding at scoring and developing possibilitiesgoals His

work-the is important to how Everton the starting lineup.major Everton have

players to manage Coleman’s lack. Godfrey and Kenny can change him in started the for a couple of weeks without a the drop-off in regards to quality.key Everton have

season actually well and they are on top of side table today. Since of injuries to the players, the last thing they would desire is for their momentum to be impacted.key The Toffees have sufficient depth and quality in their Carlo Ancelotti has the experience to

Southampton with will lack of 2 against players and side to direct his players through this stage.

have actually enhanced tremendously under Hassenhuttl and they (*) definitely elegant their possibilities (*) a weakened Everton (*).(*)

Leave a Reply